Burt Kroner argued that the transfers were gifts under tax code Section 102, which depended on the
intention of David Haring, the transferor. Kroner said he developed a close personal relationship with
Haring as a result of a long business relationship.
Kroner said Haring gifted the money to hime.
But the court found in its June 1, 2020 opinion that Kroner’s story was unconvincing and the testimony of two
other witnesses in his support wasn’t credible.
“Petitioner’s Story Is Simply Insufficient To Prove That He And Mr. Haring Had Anything More Than A Business Relationship Where Occasionally Personal Matters Were Discussed,” Judge Joseph Robert Goeke Said.
Kroner was nonetheless able to avoid a 20% penalty for tax underpayment because the court found that
the IRS didn’t satisfy a requirement under tax code Section 6751(b) for an immediate supervisor to
approve an initial determination of a penalty.
- The IRS had argued that a letter to Kroner on potential penalties sent before getting supervisory approval wasn’t the initial determination.
- The IRS said it was meant to invite Kroner to submit more information when there was an understanding that he wouldn’t pursue an administrative appeal at that time.
The case is Kroner v. Comm’r, T.C., No. 23983-14, 6/1/20.
Have an IRS Tax Problem? Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
Marini & Associates, P.A.
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
No comments:
Post a Comment