On May 8, 2017, we posted Is it Time to Expatriate? Your Neighbors Are, where we discussed that the Treasury Department published the names of individuals who renounced their U.S. citizenship or terminated their long-term U.S. residency “Expatriated” during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Since then, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed many, many parts of the Internal Revenue Code. The international tax rules, in particular, have been massively changed. But Congress did not touch Sections 877A or 2801 of the Internal Revenue Code. Those are the two special-purpose statutes that impose tax on people who renounce US citizenship or abandon their green cards.Therefore, someone who expatriates in 2018 will face the same tax laws that applied to someone expatriating in 2017, 2016, or before.
But for a certain group of Americans (mostly living abroad), the TCJA tax law radically increased the cost of keeping US citizenship. The economic incentives for renouncing citizenship or abandoning a green card, have tilted further in favor expatriation. It is now more expensive for these people to retain US citizenship.
The new tax laws created potential tax breaks for foreign corporations owned by US corporations. In many instances foreign profits flow upstream to the US parent corporation without further US tax.
- The number of published expatriates for the quarter was 2,365, bringing the total number of published expatriates in 2016 to 5,411.
- The total for the 2016 year breaks the 2015’s record number of 4,279 published expatriates.
- The number of expatriates for 2016 is a 26% increase over 2015 and a 58% increase over 2014 (3,415).
Since then, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed many, many parts of the Internal Revenue Code. The international tax rules, in particular, have been massively changed. But Congress did not touch Sections 877A or 2801 of the Internal Revenue Code. Those are the two special-purpose statutes that impose tax on people who renounce US citizenship or abandon their green cards.Therefore, someone who expatriates in 2018 will face the same tax laws that applied to someone expatriating in 2017, 2016, or before.
But for a certain group of Americans (mostly living abroad), the TCJA tax law radically increased the cost of keeping US citizenship. The economic incentives for renouncing citizenship or abandoning a green card, have tilted further in favor expatriation. It is now more expensive for these people to retain US citizenship.
The people who may
want to rethink their citizenship, will be Americans, who own or
invest in foreign businesses. Basically a US taxpayer with a US passport (or green card)
and a business outside the United States. This group of people,
entrepreneurs, investors, are the people we work with day in and day out. They
face two new disincentives, created byof the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017:
- Tax. Corporate
profit that previously would not be taxed in the United States may now
be taxed in the United States (GILTI Tax); and
- Professional Fees. The new tax laws add complexity and uncertainty.
Consider as an
example a US citizen living abroad and to owns 100% of a foreign corporation. The
foreign corporation has a business income, including anything from retail sales
to professional service. Before the 2017 TCJA,
the US citizen could reasonably expect that corporate profits would be taxable
in the foreign country, but not in the United States. The US citizen would only pay US income tax on salary and
dividends received.
The new laws create
new methods by which the United States can tax a US shareholder on profits
earned by a foreign corporation. (e.g. GILTI Tax).
The new tax laws created potential tax breaks for foreign corporations owned by US corporations. In many instances foreign profits flow upstream to the US parent corporation without further US tax.
These tax breaks do not apply to foreign corporations owned by
US individuals. The new tax rules force profits
upstream to be taxed in the hands of the US shareholders, the tax
breaks available to US corporations are available for US persons, unless they make a section 936 election to be tax is a corporation, solely for their CFC income.
Because of the additional complexity, there will be heavy legal and accounting fees for the American entrepreneur
abroad to navigate the new tax law's impact. Furthermore, legal and
accounting fees will be more expensive in the future. Form 5471 is now going to
be more complicated than before, and that means more money to prepare that tax
form.
American business
owners just had to deal with the transition tax"Section 965," which required them to be taxable on their deferred CFC income as of December 31, 2017, which takes all of the
retained earnings of foreign corporation and report this
as taxable income in 2017".
For Americans who own foreign businesses which have been operating for 20 years, they might have million of dollars in retained earnings in their controlled foreign corporations.
They face of hundreds of thousands of dollars in US tax liability on prior years retained earnings, payable over eight years, starting with their 2017 tax return.
These changes in the 2017 TCJA in the final straw for Americans and we have received emails and calls from US taxpayers asking requesting information about expatriation.
For Americans who own foreign businesses which have been operating for 20 years, they might have million of dollars in retained earnings in their controlled foreign corporations.
They face of hundreds of thousands of dollars in US tax liability on prior years retained earnings, payable over eight years, starting with their 2017 tax return.
These changes in the 2017 TCJA in the final straw for Americans and we have received emails and calls from US taxpayers asking requesting information about expatriation.
Feel Overwhelmed by IRS
International Income Tax Law?
International Income Tax Law?
Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A.
Marini & Associates, P.A.
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)
No comments:
Post a Comment