The US Tax
Court has ordered professional golfer Sergio Garcia to pay tax on endorsement
income he had claimed was tax-free under the US-Switzerland tax treaty.
The court decided Garcia's contract with his sponsor TaylorMade had attributed too much of the money to royalty payments for image rights, which the treaty exempts from US tax.
The court decided Garcia's contract with his sponsor TaylorMade had attributed too much of the money to royalty payments for image rights, which the treaty exempts from US tax.
Garcia
entered into a seven-year endorsement agreement with sponsor TaylorMade Golf
Co. (TaylorMade), allowing TaylorMade to use his image, name, and voice -
"image rights" in advertising and marketing campaigns worldwide.
Garcia
also agreed to perform personal services for TaylorMade including using its
products in all his golf play, posing and acting for advertisements, and making
personal appearances for the company.
In
return for his services and use of his image rights, TaylorMade agreed to pay
Garcia a base compensation of $7 million during the years at issue.
The
original endorsement didn't specify the percentage of remuneration attributable
to personal services or "image rights."
In a later amended agreement provide for 85% of the compensation to be allocated to royalties for his "image rights" and 15% to personal services.
In a later amended agreement provide for 85% of the compensation to be allocated to royalties for his "image rights" and 15% to personal services.
Garcia
paid no U.S. tax on the royalty payments and paid lower tax rates under Swiss
law. He did, however, pay U.S. tax on the U.S.-source personal service
payments, of which he reported a portion on Forms 1040-NR.
IRS
challenged the 85%-15% allocation between royalty and personal service
payments, claiming that the royalty portion was overstated and issued Notice of
Deficiencies in the amount of $930,249 and $789,518 for tax years 2003 and
2004, respectively.
The
court held that:
1.
Compensation paid by TaylorMade under the endorsement agreement is allocated 65%
to Royalties and 35% to Personal Services.
2. None of
the Royaltycompensation is taxable to petitioner in the United States,
but
3. All of
the U.S. source Personal Service compensation is taxable to petitioner
in the United States based on his failure to timely raise the issue of whether the
golfer's U.S.-source personal service income was exempt from U.S. tax.
Don't Want Your Tax Planning to be a "Duffer"?
Contact the Tax
Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
Marini & Associates, P.A.
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888
882-9243).
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment