The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth
Circuit today affirmed a federal district court decision that severance
payments are not wages for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act
(FICA) tax. In re Quality Stores, Inc., No. 10-1563 (6th Cir. September
7, 2012)
This tax
decision could have wide business implications since the U.S. appeals court
ruled that employment taxes should not have been imposed on severance pay in an
involuntary layoff.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals said Quality Stores Inc, a retailer, and employees who participated in the suit, could claim a refund for employment tax imposed on the severance pay.
The taxes at issue were Federal Insurance Contributions Act, or FICA, taxes that help pay for the U.S. Social Security retirement pension program and the Medicare health program. FICA taxes are paid by a company and its employees.
This decision could trigger a flood of claims for severance-pay employment-tax refunds by companies that had involuntary layoffs.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals said Quality Stores Inc, a retailer, and employees who participated in the suit, could claim a refund for employment tax imposed on the severance pay.
The taxes at issue were Federal Insurance Contributions Act, or FICA, taxes that help pay for the U.S. Social Security retirement pension program and the Medicare health program. FICA taxes are paid by a company and its employees.
This decision could trigger a flood of claims for severance-pay employment-tax refunds by companies that had involuntary layoffs.
This issue is one that has been is dispute for years and
could end up before the Supreme Court because there is a split between appeals
courts over it. In 2008, a separate court ruled against railroad
company CSX Corp, saying it was liable for FICA taxes on severance packages.
In
CSX Corp., 518 F.3d at 1346, the Federal Circuit adopted the IRS’s
eight-part administrative
definition of SUB pay set out in Rev. Rul. No. 56-249 and Rev. Rul. 90- 72
rather than the express statutory definition provided by Congress in §3402(o).
That court
characterized the payments before it as “dismissal pay” subject to FICA tax.
By contrast, we resolve
the tension between the statutory enactments and the IRS revenue rulings in
favor of the expressed will of the legislature.
In doing so, the 6th Circuit admitted their ruling created a conflict. "We acknowledge that this issue of statutory construction is complex and that the correct resolution is far from obvious". "While the Supreme Court may ultimately provide us with the correct resolution ... only Congress can clarify the statutes concerning the imposition of FICA tax."
In doing so, the 6th Circuit admitted their ruling created a conflict. "We acknowledge that this issue of statutory construction is complex and that the correct resolution is far from obvious". "While the Supreme Court may ultimately provide us with the correct resolution ... only Congress can clarify the statutes concerning the imposition of FICA tax."
If you have Payroll Tax Problems, contact the Tax Lawyers at Marini & Associates, P.A.
for a FREE Tax Consultation at www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
No comments:
Post a Comment