The Tax Court allowed Olivian Holdings LLC to keep its full $70 million 2018 conservation easement deduction and avoid roughly $26 million of tax and all penalties, solely because the IRS issued the final partnership adjustment (FPA) too late under IRC Section 6235.
·
The
court entered a stipulated decision on March 27, 2026, granting Olivian its
entire $70 million charitable contribution deduction for a Louisiana
conservation easement for 2018.
·
As part
of that decision, Olivian owes no related tax underpayment (about $26 million)
and no accuracy-related or civil fraud penalties for that year.
·
The
parties agreed that the IRS’s concession was based “solely” on the fact that
the August 3, 2023 FPA was not timely under IRC Section 6235.
·
The
notice at issue was a final partnership adjustment, which is how the IRS
communicates adjustments to partnership items under the BBA regime.
·
Olivian
argued that the IRS failed to issue the FPA within the applicable limitations
period or obtain a valid extension.
·
By
February 20, in its summary judgment motion, Olivian pointed out that the IRS
had effectively stopped arguing timeliness and instead tried to rely on the
fraud exception to keep the statute of limitations open.
·
On
March 24, counsel for both sides signed a stipulation allowing the court to
enter decision in Olivian’s favor based on the late notice.
IRS
Fraud Allegations That Went Nowhere
·
In
earlier filings, the IRS alleged Olivian was part of a fraudulent syndicated
easement shelter selling inflated deductions based on overstated appraisals.
·
The IRS
said managers knew of at least two lower appraisals, yet claimed an almost
$700,000 per‑acre value for about 170 acres by positing infeasible clay mining,
even though the land had been valued at under $3,000 per acre only 2.5 years
earlier.
·
The IRS
asserted that the managers never intended to operate a clay mine and instead
used the property purely to market pre‑packaged, overstated tax deductions.
·
Despite
these allegations, the court never reached the merits; the procedural defect
(untimely FPA) controlled the outcome.
Parallel
Agate Holdings Decision
·
Earlier
that same week, in a separate stipulated decision, the IRS also conceded a
different 2018 Louisiana conservation easement deduction — about $48 million
claimed by Agate Holdings LLC.
·
In
Agate, the IRS again lost all tax and penalties because the FPA notice was not
timely under IRC Section 6235, amid allegations the Service had backdated
extension documents to get around the statute.
·
Together,
Olivian and Agate underscore that, even in aggressive syndicated easement cases
with asserted fraud, strict adherence to the BBA statute of limitations for
FPAs can be outcome‑determinative.
·
Treat 6235 like a hard stop. In BBA partnership exams, even in
“bad facts” syndicated easement cases with strong fraud narratives, an untimely
FPA is fatal to tax and penalties; Olivian and Agate show the court will not
rescue the IRS from a blown 6235 deadline.
·
Build a
statute dossier early: calendar the
base 3‑year period, track every Form 872 / Form 8984 or equivalent extension,
and document when any modification requests were made and when they were fully
“submitted” (which drives the 270‑day rule under 6235(a)(2)).
·
Do not
concede fraud‑exception arguments casually: force the IRS to prove that a valid
fraud theory actually keeps the BBA assessment period open, rather than
assuming fraud “automatically” rescues a late FPA.
·
In any
easement BBA case, make statute of limitations and notice validity a first‑tier
issue alongside valuation and 170 compliance; as Olivian and Agate illustrate,
clean procedural wins can obviate having to litigate abusive‑scheme
allegations.
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)
Sources:
2.
https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2015/title-26/subtitle-f/chapter-63/subchapter-c/sec.-6235/
3.
https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/2458796
4.
https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/2025/oct/final-partnership-adjustment-not-issued-timely/
5.
https://natlawreview.com/article/clock-beats-commissioner-irs-concedes-48m-easement-case
6.
https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog/2026/3/25/statute-of-limitations-backdated-extensions-and-the-fraud-exception-in-agate-holdings-llc-v-commissioner
7.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/polsinelli_a-major-conservation-easement-case-just-delivered-activity-7443311322068389888-beDF
8.
https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog/2026/3/9/statute-of-limitations-and-notice-requirements-under-the-bba-centralized-partnership-audit-regime-an-analysis-of-mammoth-cave-property-llc-v-commissioner
9.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1880812852184422/posts/2980562382209458/
10.
https://citysecretary2.dallascityhall.com/pdf/AA's/2022/05 -
MAY 2022 REVISED.pdf
11.
https://readthereporter.com/DailyEdition/2021-12-13-Weekly.pdf
12.
http://weblink.arroyogrande.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=304450&dbid=0&repo=ArroyoGrande
13.
https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/federal/articles/2415943/11th-circ-urged-to-restore-cut-to-17m-easement-deduction
14.
https://dekalbschoolsga.blob.core.windows.net/wpcontent/2023/11/ics-2024-min.pdf
15.
https://irvingtx.gov/index.php?section=boards-appointments-committee







