Thursday, February 20, 2025

BOI is Back With a New March 21, 2025 Deadline!


FINCEN updated its page to state that:

Alert: Ongoing Litigation – Smith, et al. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al., 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.): Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements back in Effect.
[Updated February 19, 2025] 

With the February 18, 2025, decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Smith, et al. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al., 6:24-cv-00336 (E.D. Tex.), beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) are once again back in effect. However, because the Department of the Treasury recognizes that reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations, FinCEN is generally extending the deadline 30 calendar days from February 19, 2025, for most companies. 

Notably, in keeping with Treasury’s commitment to reducing regulatory burden on businesses, during this 30-day period FinCEN will assess its options to further modify deadlines, while prioritizing reporting for those entities that pose the most significant national security risks. 

FinCEN also intends to initiate a process this year to revise the BOI reporting rule to reduce burden for lower-risk entities, including many U.S. small businesses. 

Updated Deadlines

  • For the vast majority of reporting companies, the new deadline to file an initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI report is now March 21, 2025. FinCEN will provide an update before then of any further modification of this deadline, recognizing that reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations once this update is provided.

  • Reporting companies that were previously given a reporting deadline later than the March 21, 2025 deadline must file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. For example, if a company’s reporting deadline is in April 2025 because it qualifies for certain disaster relief extensions, it should follow the April deadline, not the March deadline.

  • As indicated in the alert titled “Notice Regarding National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.)”, Plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv01448 (N.D. Ala.)—namely, Isaac Winkles, reporting companies for which Isaac Winkles is the beneficial owner or applicant, the National Small Business Association, and members of the National Small Business Association (as of March 1, 2024)—are not currently required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN at this time.

  • For updates on other litigation related to the Corporate Transparency Act and its effect on reporting requirements for certain plaintiffs, see alerts below.

For more information, see FinCEN Notice, FIN-2025-CTA1, FinCEN Extends Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadline by 30 Days; Announces Intention to Revise Reporting Rule (February 18, 2025).

Need Help Filing Your BOI Report?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

 


 

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Maine Judge Denies Challenge To Corporate Transparency Act


According to Law360, a Maine federal judge upheld the Corporate Transparency Act, rejecting one of several challenges across federal courts claiming Congress lacked the power to require companies to disclose their real owners.

U.S. District Judge Stacey D. Neumann on Friday granted a motion for summary judgment from the government while denying a similar bid from William Boyle, a majority owner of Maine-based LLCs, who sued in March seeking a declaratory judgment that the CTA is unconstitutional.

The judge said Congress appropriately found that the so-called beneficial ownership information called for in the CTA is necessary for protecting interstate and foreign commerce, and that lawmakers "asserted a rational basis for concluding the existence of corporate entities has a substantial effect on interstate commerce."

"In Light Of The Massive Role Corporate Entities Play In 
The Modern Economy, The Court Readily Finds A Rational
Basis Exists To Conclude Corporate Entities' Existence Has A Substantial Effect On Interstate Commerce,"
Judge Neumann Said.

"Therefore, Congress may regulate such entities, and the CTA is authorized by the commerce clause."

Boyle had argued that the CTA is not regulating activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, and Judge Neumann noted the plaintiff focused "largely on dormant entities that own no assets and make no transactions." But the judge said it "strains credulity to imagine that any significant portion of the 2 million entities formed each year will exist perpetually without engaging in commercial transactions."

Daniel L. Rosenthal of Marcus Clegg, counsel for Boyle, said in a statement that he thinks other U.S. district courts that have found the CTA to be likely unconstitutional "reached the right conclusion."

"We're disappointed with the ruling and will be reviewing it and considering our client's options going forward, including an appeal to the First Circuit." Rosenthal said of Friday's order.

The law remains paused nationwide as a result of a suit alleging Congress exceeded its authority under the constitution's commerce clause by enacting it. 

Cases are underway at four circuit courts, and more are in the pipeline, making it likely that the matter will ultimately be resolved by the justices, attorneys previously told Law360.

Need Help Filing Your BOI Report?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

 


Friday, February 7, 2025

Federal District Courts Authorize IRS “John Doe” Summonses to Trident Trust

In a News Release, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that several U.S. district courts have authorized the IRS to serve John Doe summonses on various Trident Trust entities. The summoned entities are members of a multinational group of affiliated companies known as the "Trident Trust." Group."

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered an order earlier this week authorizing the IRS to serve John Doe summonses on TT (USA) Holdings Inc.; Trident Corporate Services Inc. and Trident Fund Services Inc., entities that are members of a multinational group of affiliated companies generally operating under the trade name “Trident Trust” and collectively referred to as the “Trident Trust Group.”

Separately, on Dec. 18, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota entered an order, unsealed on Jan. 21, authorizing service of a similar John Doe summons on Trident Trust Company (South Dakota) Inc. The United States also previously obtained approval in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the IRS to serve John Doe summonses on a different affiliate entity of the Trident Trust Group, as well as to third party financial service companies, banks and courier services that may have information about Trident Trust Group’s U.S. taxpayer clients.

The United States is not alleging that any of the entities engaged in wrongdoing. Rather, the IRS uses John Doe summonses to obtain information about possible violations of internal revenue laws by individuals whose identities are unknown. These summonses seek information about U.S. individuals who may have used the Trident Trust Group’s services to underreport their worldwide income and conceal their ownership of certain foreign assets that U.S. individuals are required to report to the U.S. government.

A declaration from an IRS revenue agent that accompanied the petitions alleges that at least nine U.S. taxpayers used Trident Trust Group’s services to avoid compliance with U.S. tax laws. The declaration further alleges that the IRS learned of this noncompliance through the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, a program that allowed U.S. taxpayers to voluntarily disclose foreign accounts or entities used to evade tax in exchange for settling their civil liabilities on fixed terms.

A representative of Trident Trust responded to us that:

We are aware of the IRS petitions. Each of our trust and corporate services businesses is regulated in the jurisdiction in which it operates and is fully committed to compliance with all applicable regulations. All clients are assessed via a thorough onboarding process.    

“Trident Trust proactively informs the relevant authorities where any compliance process gives rise to concerns.  We also fulfil our obligations in relation to the Automatic Exchange of Information in taxation matters, including FATCA and CRS reporting.”  

 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)




Monday, January 27, 2025

BOI Reporting Is Yet Again Temporarily Halted Due To a Nationwide Injunction

On January 13, 2025 we posted, as of December 26, 2024, the Enforcement of BOI Reporting Is Again Temporarily Halted Due To a Nationwide Injunctionwhere we discussed thatas of december 26, 2024, the enforcement of beneficial ownership information (boy) reporting requirements is temporarily halted due to a nationwide injunction (again).

 On January 24, 2025 FinCEN posted an alert about an order issued in a separate case, Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury (135 AFTR 2d 2025-370, DC TX, 1/7/2025). In that case, a federal district court enjoined enforcement of the CTA only as to the named plaintiffs. However, the Smith court stayed the effective date of the beneficial ownership reporting rule pending the outcome of the case, putting the rule on hold as to all reporting entities.

In light of this federal court order, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force. 

However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports. 

Need Help Filing Your BOI Report?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

 


Tuesday, January 21, 2025

IRS Issuing Partnership 'Soft Letters' To Comply With a Centralized Partnership Audit Regime

According to Law360,  the Internal Revenue Service will keep using an educational compliance tool called soft letters to prod taxpayers to comply with a centralized partnership audit regime that has recently turned its focus to larger and more complicated entities, an agency official said.

Soft letters, which the agency commonly sends out as a compliance measure in other areas, will be an ongoing effort in a relatively new practice area for pass-through entities within the IRS' Large Business and International Division, according to Clifford R. Scherwinski, director of that practice area. He spoke during the D.C. Bar Tax Conference, held in Washington, D.C., and online.

The Goal of The Letters, Which Request Additional Taxpayer Information Similar To An Examination, Is To "Understand Your Challenges As Practitioners And Taxpayers," Scherwinski Said.

So when the IRS sends out such a letter, "it's not always going to result in an audit," he said.

During a round of audits in 2023, the IRS sent 500 soft letters to LB&I partnerships with beginning- and ending-year balance sheet discrepancies, he said.

In 2021, the IRS began its focus on partnership audits of large, high-wealth entities as part of the centralized partnership audit regime enacted by the Bipartisan Budget Act 2015, which took effect in 2018. The agency dialed up those efforts in fall 2023 and identified 76 of the country's largest partnerships for audit thanks in large part to the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act's additional funding for the IRS.

The targeted partnerships have an average total of assets exceeding $10 billion, according to Scherwinski.

To improve the audit process, Scherwinski said, his practice area employed advanced data analytics techniques, as well as expertise from new hires that have experience dealing with these complicated business structures.

Scherwinski's team also looked at a stratified sample across various industries.

"We intentionally looked at ... hedge funds, real estate, publicly traded partnerships, large law firms and other industries out there, because we need to again learn from these experiences," he said. 

The goal is "to really continue to understand the tax risk that's posed" by these large, high-wealth entities that file tax returns, Scherwinski said.

 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)





IRS Start a Fast Track Settlement Pilot Programs To Make Alternative Dispute Resolution Faster & Easier

The Internal Revenue Service announced three pilot programs that will test changes to existing Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) programs. IRS ADR programs are designed to help taxpayers resolve tax disputes earlier and more efficiently.

“The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of IRS transformation efforts in alignment with the IRS Strategic Operating Plan,” said Elizabeth Askey, Chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals (Appeals). “We’re committed to providing taxpayers who wish to resolve their issues without litigation a choice of effective and efficient ADR options as early as possible.”

“The IRS has historically made ADR available at various stages of the administrative process. Because ADR can be a quicker, more collaborative and cost-effective approach to case resolution, we have been working to improve ADR functionality and emphasizing its benefits,” said Michael Baillif, Director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. “By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as Fast Track Settlement and Post-Appeals Mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties.”


The pilots announced by the IRS focus on Fast Track Settlement (FTS), a program that allows Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and Post-Appeals Mediation (PAM), a program in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer. Among other things, the pilots:

  • Align the Large Business and International (LB&I), Small Business and Self-Employed (SB/SE) and Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) divisions in offering FTS on an issue-by-issue basis. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue that was ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. This Announcement increases ADR availability and flexibility by allowing FTS for single issues.
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. This helps ensure a more consistent and deliberate consideration of FTS and PAM requests.
  • Clarify that when requests for FTS or PAM are formally denied, taxpayers will receive an explanation for the denial. This facilitates transparency in the ADR process, even when acceptance of a request is not feasible.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS to their case. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers in the pilot group regarding the availability of FTS and measure the extent of participation when taxpayers are reminded of their FTS options immediately prior to the case entering Appeals’ jurisdiction.

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. Eliminating this restriction on PAM eligibility encourages the use of ADR options.

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers.

Additional improvements in various ADR programs are under development and will be rolled out as they are finalized. The IRS remains committed to creating and maintaining a robust set of ADR offerings that allow taxpayers multiple options for successfully resolving their cases.

 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Trident Trust Receives “John Doe” Summonses For Records Relating To U.S. Taxpayers


According to DoJ, the IRS announced that U.S. District Judge John P. Cronan entered an order on December 23, 2024 authorizing the IRS to issue summonses requiring certain entities to produce information about U.S. taxpayers, including individuals and trusts, who may have used the services of a multinational group of affiliated companies that operate under the trade name “Trident Trust” (collectively, the “Trident Trust Group”) to evade federal income taxes.  

Specifically, the IRS summonses seek records from a Trident Trust Group affiliate, as well as from companies that may have facilitated electronic fund transfers and courier deliveries to Trident Trust Group entities, to identify U.S. taxpayers who may have used the Trident Trust Group’s services to create or control foreign assets and entities to potentially avoid compliance with their U.S. tax obligations.

Acting U.S. Attorney Edward Y. Kim said: 

“Today’s Action Is Part of This Office’s Steadfast Commitment To Hold Accountable Those Who Use Offshore Service Providers To Avoid Paying Their U.S. Taxes.  In Obtaining Authority To Issue These Latest John Doe Summonses, We Continue Our Joint Efforts With The IRS To Investigate Tax Evaders Who Use Foreign Financial Accounts And Sham Foreign Entities To Hide Their Assets And Income"

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said: “U.S. taxpayers and their facilitators who hide offshore income generating activities and assets from the U.S. government are on notice that the IRS continues to prioritize combatting offshore abusive activities.  These records will assist the IRS and its partners in finding those taxpayers, ensuring their compliance with the U.S. tax laws and delivering on our mission of a fair tax system.”

Federal tax law requires U.S. citizens, resident aliens, and trusts with gross annual income above the reporting threshold to pay taxes on all their income earned worldwide.  They must also disclose their interests in certain foreign financial accounts, assets, and entities.  Failure to report these offshore arrangements or pay associated taxes can result in serious civil and criminal consequences.  According to the allegations set forth in the documents filed in support of the petition to authorize the John Doe summonses, and other information in the public record:

The Trident Trust Group is a privately owned network of entities operating in nearly 30 jurisdictions worldwide, including known tax havens.  The Trident Trust Group has provided corporate, trust, and fund administration services for over 40 years.  It offers, among other things, services that enable customers to conceal their interests in offshore accounts and entities, including creating opaque corporate structures in jurisdictions with strict privacy laws, providing corporate directors and officers who act on their customers’ behalf, mail forwarding and retention services, and inactive companies known as “shelf companies” that are dormant and sitting “on a shelf” for purpose of later sale, that are incorporated with a standard memoranda or articles of association and have inactive shareholders, directors, and secretaries.  The Trident Trust Group advertises these services as assisting its clients in keeping confidential their beneficial ownership of assets and avoiding public reporting, including for “tax and estate planning.”

Some U.S. clients of the Trident Trust Group use or may use these services to conceal their interests in assets and avoid paying U.S. taxes on them.  For example, Trident Trust Group employees have listed themselves as the founders, directors, and officers of thousands of Panamanian companies to help their U.S. taxpayer clients potentially conceal their interests in and income from these foreign entities. 

Indeed, at least nine U.S. taxpayers who used the Trident Trust Group’s services to conceal their interests in foreign assets have reported their tax non-compliance to the IRS through the agency’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, which allowed U.S. taxpayers to voluntarily disclose their foreign accounts or entities used to evade tax liability in exchange for fixed penalties.

In this action, the Court granted the IRS permission to serve what is known as a “John Doe” summons on Nevis Services Limited, a Trident Trust Group affiliate based in Manhattan, that seeks information about U.S. taxpayers who may have used its services or those of other entities within the Trident Trust Group to establish, maintain, operate, or control: any foreign financial account or other foreign asset; any foreign corporation, company, trust, foundation, or other legal entity; or any foreign or domestic financial account or other asset in the name of such foreign entity, from 2014 through 2023.  

By Obtaining These Records, The IRS Expects To Be
Able To Identify Trident Trust Group Clients Who Used
The Group’s Services To Avoid Or Evade U.S. Taxes.

In addition, the Court also granted the IRS leave to serve summonses on twelve financial entities and courier services: 

  1. the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; 
  2. Clearing House Payments Company LLC; 
  3. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.; 
  4. the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; 
  5. Citibank, N.A.; 
  6. UBS AG; Bank of America, N.A.; 
  7. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; 
  8. FedEx Corporation; 
  9. DHL Express (USA), Inc.; and 
  10. United Parcel Service, Inc. 
There is no allegation in this action that these financial entities and courier services have engaged in any wrongdoing.  Rather, the IRS uses John Doe summonses to obtain information about possible violations of internal revenue laws by individuals whose identities are unknown.  The John Doe summonses direct these financial entities and courier services to produce records that will enable the IRS to identify U.S. taxpayers who have sent or received money or documents to or from the Trident Trust Group, along with other records relating to these transactions.

In parallel, the U.S. has sought John Doe summonses in the U.S. District Courts for the Northern District of Georgia and the District of South Dakota authorizing the IRS to issue summonses to four other U.S.-based entities in the Trident Trust Group seeking information about U.S. taxpayers who may have used the Group’s services.

A representative of Trident Trust responded to us that:

We are aware of the IRS petitions. Each of our trust and corporate services businesses is regulated in the jurisdiction in which it operates and is fully committed to compliance with all applicable regulations. All clients are assessed via a thorough onboarding process.    

“Trident Trust proactively informs the relevant authorities where any compliance process gives rise to concerns.  We also fulfil our obligations in relation to the Automatic Exchange of Information in taxation matters, including FATCA and CRS reporting.”  

They also noted that the quote from the press release referencing U.S. taxpaying clients who have used the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, as per the court documents, where voluntary disclosures occurred between 2010 and 2014.   

 Have an IRS Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)